YAML (YAML Ain't Markup Language) and TOML (Tom's Obvious, Minimal Language) are both human-friendly configuration file formats, but they approach the problem of structured data differently. YAML uses indentation-based nesting similar to Python, where whitespace determines the hierarchy of data. TOML uses explicit section headers in square brackets and dotted keys, making the structure visible regardless of whitespace.
YAML was designed as a general-purpose data serialization language. Its specification is extensive, supporting advanced features like anchors, aliases, merge keys, custom type tags, and multiple document separators. This power comes at the cost of complexity and a larger attack surface. YAML deserialization vulnerabilities have caused remote code execution in Python, Ruby, and Java applications because the format allows constructing arbitrary objects from parsed data.
TOML was created by Tom Preston-Werner (co-founder of GitHub) specifically for configuration files. Its design philosophy prioritizes minimalism: the specification is intentionally small, the format maps unambiguously to a hash table, and there are no features that could enable code execution during parsing. TOML supports native datetime types without relying on tags or custom constructors, and its syntax makes simple configuration flat and readable without requiring understanding of indentation rules.
The practical trade-off centers on nesting depth. YAML handles deeply nested structures gracefully because indentation scales naturally. TOML uses dotted keys and repeated section headers for nesting, which becomes verbose beyond two or three levels. A Kubernetes deployment manifest with nested spec, template, containers, and volume mount definitions would be awkward in TOML but natural in YAML. Conversely, a simple application config with database host, port, and credentials is cleaner in TOML than YAML because TOML makes the section boundaries explicit.
| Feature | YAML | TOML |
|---|---|---|
| Readability | Clean but indentation-sensitive | Clear with explicit section headers |
| Indentation significance | Yes, whitespace defines structure | No, uses [section] headers and dotted keys |
| Nested data | Excellent with deep nesting support | Gets verbose for deeply nested structures |
| Comment support | Full comment support with # | Full comment support with # |
| Date/time types | Supports datetime via tags | Native date, time, and datetime types |
| Multi-line strings | Multiple styles (|, >, folded, literal) | Triple-quoted strings (basic and literal) |
| Spec complexity | Large spec with many features | Small, focused specification |
| Security | Deserialization vulnerabilities possible | Safe by design, no custom tags |
| Ecosystem adoption | Kubernetes, Docker Compose, CI/CD, Ansible | Rust (Cargo.toml), Python (pyproject.toml), Hugo |
| Anchors and aliases | Supports DRY with anchors (&) and aliases (*) | No anchor or alias mechanism |
Use YAML for DevOps tooling (Kubernetes, Docker Compose, CI/CD pipelines) where deep nesting and ecosystem convention demand it. Use TOML for application configuration files where simplicity, safety, and explicit structure matter more than flexibility. TOML excels for Rust (Cargo.toml), Python (pyproject.toml), and Go projects.
Evaluate the depth of your configuration structure. If your config has three or more levels of nesting with arrays of objects (like Kubernetes manifests or Ansible playbooks), YAML handles it more elegantly. If your config is mostly flat key-value pairs organized into logical sections (database settings, server options, feature flags), TOML produces cleaner, less error-prone files.
Consider your language ecosystem. Rust projects universally use TOML for Cargo.toml. Python's packaging ecosystem has standardized on pyproject.toml. Go projects increasingly use TOML for application configuration. If you are working within these ecosystems, using TOML aligns with community expectations and tooling. Conversely, DevOps and infrastructure-as-code tools (Kubernetes, Helm, Docker Compose, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI) are built around YAML.
Assess your security posture. If your application parses configuration from potentially untrusted sources, TOML is inherently safer because it cannot trigger object construction or code execution during parsing. YAML requires using safe loaders and careful configuration to avoid deserialization attacks. For application configuration that only trusted developers edit, this difference is less critical.
Use PinusX tools to work with both formats. The YAML Formatter validates and beautifies YAML files, while the TOML-JSON Converter handles TOML transformations. Both tools run with 100% client-side processing, ensuring your configuration data with potentially sensitive values like database passwords and API keys stays entirely in your browser.
Not practically. Kubernetes manifests use deeply nested structures with arrays of objects (containers, volumes, environment variables) that become very verbose in TOML. The entire Kubernetes ecosystem including Helm, Kustomize, and kubectl is built around YAML. Using TOML would require custom tooling with no community support.
Yes. TOML's specification is intentionally minimal and does not support custom type tags or object construction during parsing. YAML's advanced features like custom tags have caused remote code execution vulnerabilities in multiple languages. TOML maps cleanly to a hash table without any features that could trigger arbitrary code during deserialization.
TOML is the modern standard for Python project configuration via pyproject.toml, which replaces setup.py and setup.cfg. Python 3.11+ includes a built-in tomllib module for reading TOML. YAML remains common for application runtime configuration and DevOps tooling, but TOML is preferred for project metadata and build configuration.
Yes, TOML supports arrays of tables using double-bracket syntax [[array]] and nested tables using dotted keys or [parent.child] headers. However, the syntax becomes repetitive for structures deeper than three levels, where YAML's indentation-based nesting is more concise and easier to maintain.
Get instant alerts when your endpoints go down. 60-second checks, free forever.
Start Monitoring Free →